Itâs not so much that the MPC â¦ As you’d expect, lower prices inevitably mean a shrink in features, so here’s where akai has made some comprises. MPC One vs Live II vs MPC X included samples ?? There’s a few potential disadvantages to look at here, some of which may seem of little importance depending on your needs. So when it comes to MIDI the MPC One really isn’t at a disadvantage (other than not supporting bluetooth MIDI).Â Â. Firstly those pads are smaller than ‘typical’ MPC pads, but in my opinion they are not so small to be a problem. Both are good for creating songs…. Are the lack of dedicated buttons an issue on the MPC Live and MPC One? However many producers will instead bounce down their individual track stems to WAV files using the MPC’s internal export options, or via the ‘bounce to audio track’ function; at this point they can just load those WAVs into their favourite DAW.Â And remember that you can actually perform complex mixdowns entirely within the MPC. I would assume this works with MPC software as well, but there is nothing noting this on the product page as the Live and X have. Yes, pretty much same feel and construction, just smaller. It will teach you everything you need to know about creating music on these standalone beasts, featuring a comprehensive set of carefully structured tutorials that take you on a step-by-step journey into quickly developing your own perfect MPC workflow. Function buttons are also arranged somewhat differently on each unit (and perhaps a little bit arbitrary). The MPC X, in my opinion has always been somewhat overpriced considering there is no bump in CPU or RAM, and that mouthwatering $2200 is a tough pill to swallow when you look at what’s available for much less from the other two MPCs in the range. As you can see, each of these MPCs is a powerful, modern sampling groovebox, all of which are also more than capable of acting as a centrepiece for a sample and MIDI-based studio, so I don’t think you can go wrong with any of them. The main difference between Live and MPC Touch is in its size - the Live â¦ It’sÂ great entry level MPC and perfect if you don’t really have any specific need for all the additional inputs and outputs found on the more expensive units. Where is is going to live? The only thing I can think of is to recrod the pad or program I wish to effect to an external recorder, play that recording through the hardware fx and have that record into the MPC One – but this seems a bit convoluted. For example, no internal battery, â¦ Canât answer with certainty as I got 30-40 mins use out of my MPC ONE today before it wouldnât switch on anymore, but Iâll give my take as I work in a similar way currently using an Octatrack. firing off Ableton clips etc). Here’s Flux with one of these batteries: As you might expect, the more expensive the MPC, the better the audio input and output options. Akai MPC One & MPC Live II £639/£1040 Future Music | July 2020 The reinvigorated MPC range gains two new hardware devices and a software update. Over time the two will start to resemble one another in terms of functionality according to Dan, but I doubt it will ever be 1:1 and the MPC will always be an MPC. Street Price: $399.99-2199.99 USD. Therefore when it comes to deciding which MPC to buy, it really just comes down to comparing price, hardware features and overall form factor. The MPC Live also lacks hardware controls critical to a hands-on workflow (eg buttons for modesâ¦instead it has + / - buttons which are pretty much uselessâ¦the MPC One remedies this to â¦ The adjustable screen is also definitely an ergonomic bonus as it helps avoid having to ‘hunch’ over your MPC. Si Truss dives back inâ¦ Si Truss. Sounds either false or useless to me. The MPC X has that bigger titling screen, it’s the same resolution as the 7″ screen so everything is just scaled up in size – this means if you have big fat fingers you’ll probably enjoy the touchscreen UI a lot more (some areas of the UI are a bit fiddly to use at the best of times). Since 2002, I’ve been creating resources dedicated to the Akai MPC sampler, as well as running the huge MPC community over at MPC-forums.com. You might get away with using a dynamic mic directly into an MPC audio input, but it will be noisy. For field recording direct into an MPC Live II or MPC One, you could use a portable recorder like the Zoom H1n; apart from recording directly to its internal drive, it also has a stereo line out which can be connected to the MPC audio inputs with a suitable cable. Unless you plan to always track certain sounds out through different outputs (e.g. The 'MPC Bible' from MPC-Tutor is the complete guide to using the latest standalone MPCs from Akaiâ¦ i understand the pads on the one are smaller, but do they have the same construction/feel as the live and X? Though it is limited in many ways. Well some people clearly love having the option to make beats on the go, sitting on buses, in the park, on planes, on the sofa etc, and it’s definitely very handy and flexible to have that truly portable option (I find I can easily get at least 4 hours from the MPC Live battery). I’m probably best known for my critically acclaimed ‘Beat Making on the MPC’ books. Obviously the MPC X has been given the full suite of buttons and dials, with more than double the buttons of the other two MPCS ensuring that you can access any screen in the MPC OS without needing to reach for the touchscreen. Akai have released a new touchscreen ‘standalone’ MPC, the MPC One, which is now being pitched as Akai’s new ‘entry level’ MPC. Once again we have an MPC running the same CPU/RAM and the exact same software, and as such we’d expect it to continue supporting future firmware updates. You do tend to adapt your workflow accordingly, plus on the two smaller MPCs all the missing ‘dedicated’ shortcuts can be found as secondary functions by holding down the SHIFT or MENU keys. This is done via ethernet or wifi or even via an USB-ethernet adapter (remember, no wifi on the MPC One). That said, all these MPCs can actually be powered for several hours by off-the-shelf 19V rechargeable laptop batteries, which give the MPC One a bit more flexibility for mobile beat making, albeit for an extra $95 battery cost and around 600g extra weight to carry around. MC-707 vs MPC Live vs Akai Pro Force. Akai Professional has announced its newest portable standalone music production center, the MPC Live II, which they say is packed with all the enhancements from the recent software update for the entire MPC line, MPC 2.8.. Akai says that MPC Live â¦ The lack of turntable input means you’ll either have to use a turntable with a line level output (which is now very common on modern turntables), or route your turntable’s outputs through a preamp first (most commonly you could use a DJ Mixer for this). An advantage of the MPC One is an Ethernet port for a faster connection with Ableton but one of the disadvantages is it doesnât support Ableton live control? He runs the MPC-Tutor.com network of sites, which includes MPC-Samples.com and the thriving MPC community at MPC-Forums.com, regularly helping tens of thousands of MPC users every month with MPC technical support and guidance. It’s also the only MPC that retains the classic MPC ‘cursor’ keys for button-based navigation, and the only one with dedicated ‘STEP’ and ‘BAR’ buttons to quickly navigate the sequencer timeline. Q-Links are on the right for the Live II and the MPC One but on the left for the MPC X. The MPC One seems to have triggered a swell of new interest in the MPC. The single MIDI input seems even less of an issue when you consider that currently the MPC firmware doesn’t actually support multitimbral MIDI input (it only supports multitimbral output). Please note that this article was written before the release of the MPC Live II. On the ONE, you would just have to solo internally what you want to record/effect. MPC One does not have Aux outputs and allows only 4GV of online storage. thanks for taking the time. If you go for the X then it’s probably going to become the centrepiece of your studio – and once it’s in place all your other gear has to fit around it! The following table gives a quick comparison of features that can differ across the standalone MPC models. Both the MPC One and the MPC X place the screen directly above the pads, while the MPC Live II (just like the MPC Live I before it) places the pads to the left of the screen. The MPC Live II keeps the phono inputs but forgoes the mic and instrument inputs and goes with 6 individual outs, while the MPC One has the tightest selection, with just two individual outputs and no mic, phono or instrument inputs. I’ve used this with good results. Akai Pro MPC X, Live & One - Installing and Accessing the Included Plugins. These MPCS all differ in a variety of ways but it’s very important to realise that all three MPCs use the exact same CPU and RAM; there is no difference in computing ‘power’ and all three machines have the same memory limits (2GB, but nearly half of this is used by the operating system).Â They also all run the exact same internal software with the same features (the only exception is the MPC One does not have Ableton ‘Live Control’ Mode, more about this later). They have both the same software and system. Last year at NAMM 2019, Akai introduced a risk-taking product, the Akai Force. The MPC Live II sits somewhere in the middle but is still a little overpriced for my liking, especially considering the large number of similarities to the MPC One.Â But it is unique with its internal battery and speaker as well as it’s decent I/O. Live control is just that, controlling Ableton Live software using the MPC as a controller (e.g. The MPC Live is an MPC, nothing else needs to be said. Times move fast, and now it’s official; the original MPC Live is discontinued and replaced with the new MPC Live II, meaning the current Akai MPC line up now consists of three distinct MPCs; the entry-level MPC One, the mid-range MPC Live II and the (now three year old) studio workhorse, the MPC X. So… which MPC is right for you? In fact, the MPC Live claims the title of the most self-sufficient MPC ever, thanks to an in-built lithium ion battery that allows between four and six hours of plug-free operation. ... (iPad one of the best options). A single pair of MIDI in/out is again perhaps not going to be a huge issue for many people. The MPC One is $699, which is a bargain when you consider the MPC Live is around $1,000 and the MPC X costs about $2,000. Just remember that the MPC Touch seems to be discontinued these days so second hand is probably the most likely option unless you can find a retailer with old stock. https://www.gear4music.com/PA-DJ-and-Lighting/Behringer-XENYX-X1832USB-18-Channel-Analog-Mixer/GXK. But with its internal battery and built in speaker, the MPC Live II is of course the ‘out of the box’ winner here – just pull it out, turn it on and make beats anywhere (but you might want to use headphones if you’re sitting on a train!). By MPC-Tutor | Last modified: May 19, 2020 | 9 Comments. Doing this on the MPC One, I would surely end up creating feedback loops because there is only the stereo master output and monitored audio passes through this. Another area where these MPCs all differ is overall the layout of elements. The workaround for the other MPCs is to use some kind of tilting stand. And remember if money is an important factor you can always pick up a second hand MPC Live for similar money to a new MPC One. There’s no speaker (but do you really need a speaker?) Oh, and about those ‘compact’ pads on the MPC One – in my opinion they are absolutely fine (I have average size fingers). Best ‘Beats on the go’ Option: With its internal battery and speakers the MPC Live II is definitely the most naturally suited to making music whenever the mood takes you, snd with its decent array of audio ports and flexible MIDI options it’s equally at home in the studio.Â If the MPC One didn’t exist I’d be recommending the MPC Live II to everyone, but as it stands I just think that unless you really need those extra ports and are going to make good use of that internal battery, the MPC One edges it with its comparable features, ultra-portability and significantly lower price, and don’t forget it can be used with an external rechargeable battery if you really need that additional portability. One layout isn’t necessarily better than the other, and I do feel this is simply another area where you quickly adapt your style accordingly. By MPC-Tutor, last updated on Aug 14, 2020, By MPC-Tutor, last updated on Jun 3, 2020 1 Comment, By MPC-Tutor, last updated on May 19, 2020 9 Comments. Simpler can be better ð. They can all also function as dedicated controllers for Akai’s DAW-like MPC Software (which comes free with all these MPCs). Please note in this article I’m going to assume you’ve already researched and discounted all the other sampler/groovebox options out there and just need help deciding on the best standalone MPC for your specific needs.Â. FinallyÂ there’s also the ‘beats on the go’ factor – whether it’s banging out a tune on the train or in the park, or lounging around chopping breaks on your couch, these smaller MPCs again have the MPC X nailed. As for recording quality mic performances on the MPC Live II and the MPC One, you’ll need some kind of mic preamp when using condenser mics, or use a mixer which often have these built into a couple of channels. And the overall layout is now more centralised, with the screen directly above the pads instead of to one side, which many will prefer as it takes away any left/right bias to the workflow. Overcoming the lack of phono inputs on the MPC One is also less of a problem these days as most modern turntables have ‘line level’ outputs, or you can just run the turntable via a standard DJ Mixer first (which converts phono level to line level for you). We've included a dedicated 'standalone' installer for easy drag-and-drop installation to your standalone MPC disk (plus an XPN file for optional MPC â¦ And remember you can of course revert to using the touchscreen to navigate the OS, although the menu diving can sometimes get a bit tedious. All these MPCs can be used a powerful MIDI sequencers, capable of controlling dozens of connected hardware synths, sound modules, modular synths and even iPad synths, and at their heart all have a powerful sampler with the classic MPC chopping features along with other goodies such as pro-quality FX, built in plugin instruments,Â keygroup sample instrument support, audio tracks, step sequencer, piano roll, looper, clips, automation and a range of performance enhancing features including the XYFX interface. On the software side, the MPC Live II and MPC One use the MPC software, which ties in with the desktop MPC DAWâ¦ Of course for many producers their MPC will never leave their studio, so having the internal battery is neither here nor there, plus you can use portable laptop batteries if need be. I have read and understand that the MPC X and Live 2 both â¦ Akai MPC Live IIâs standalone capabilities follow that of the MPC X and MPC One, with the addition of an internal lithium-ion battery, offering five hours of on-the-go use â this is one hour less than Live IIâs â¦ Todayâs MPCâs are the successors of the classic grooveboxes that defined early hip-hop production. The MPC combines sampling and sequencing â¦ 1. The included sample library is much smaller on the MPC One. Beyond this, the MPCs share the same features, such as CPU, RAM, software etc. Sure, if you intend triggering an army of hardware synths then the Live’s two MIDI Outs will be better although you might even prefer to look at the MPC X with its 4 MIDI Outs. Thanks in advance. Times move fast, and now itâs official; the original MPC Live is discontinued and replaced with the new MPC Live II, meaning the current Akai MPC line up now consists of three distinct MPCs; the entry-level MPC One, the mid-range MPC Live II and the (now three year old) studio workhorse, the MPC X. I can’t find the answer to this anywhere. This year, Akai is approaching a similar problem from the other end: making a relatively budget conscious standalone groovebox production unit with the MPC One. UPDATE: since MPC 2.8 all MPCs support multi-timbral MIDI and you can also connect up to 32 USB MIDI devices via the USB ports (or via a USB hub) – this includes adding a USB-to-MIDI interface for adding more DIN MIDI ports. I previously wrote about the new MPC One but at that time the MPC Live II was just a rumour. Though it is limited in many ways. In my April SOS review I said the MPC Live was a breakthrough device; I may even have allowed one âgame-changerâ to slip through the marketing-speak filter. Good luck on your decision mate, it can be a tough one to work out. If you’ve built up the muscle memory you’ll likely have a huge advantage on your 1k… and honestly, this can be huge. Boasting a compact size, the MPC One packs a bunch of features and tools into ONE â¦ If price is important to you then the MPC One wins hands down. But in terms of software, it runs the same MPC Software as the standalone MPCs, plus with the added bonus of VST and AU plugin support. to route to external FX, or to a mixer etc) or perhaps route the metronome separate outputs, you are probably just fine with the two outputs. How big a deal is this? The MPC X/Live/One come bundled with a variety of AIR and SONiVOX plugins that expand the musical palette of your production. thats why i dont buy mpc new series…i donno why ignoreed this most important feature by akai…. How does that make sense? And when it comes to backing up up your work, the MPC X and MPC Live II are much more flexible than the MPC One, as when connected to a computer via USB all your attached MPC disks (but not the factory internal drive) appear as removable drives in your computer, allowing you to drag and drop files back and forth. Akai MPC One: A more affordable MPC with a lot of similarity to the Live and Live II. ** MIDI devices can be connected via the traditional MIDI DIN ports, via bluetooth, or via USB (up to 32 devices via a USB hub). Probably the easiest option these days is to use an SD card, these are cheap, reliable, fast enough and I’ve had no problem getting a 512GB SD card to work, including this micro SD in an adapter. Basically turning the MPC into a very basic Push. So storage is realistically handled either by SD card or USB stick. Storage options are a bit more limited, but SD cards are fast and cheap so I don’t think you’ll miss the internal SATA option. The MPC Live II will serve the majority of your needs if youâre in the market for a new Akai box, even if its stablemates have more specific functions. These MPCs are all completely standalone units – that is, they don’t need to be plugged into a computer, they provide a complete ‘in the box’ workflow all controlled by the large touchscreen UI and a combination of buttons, dials, knobs and pads. Firstly, there is no option to add an internal SATA drive, and the factory ‘internal drive’ is tiny and in my opinion best left as a ‘read only’ drive that stores the factory content. Read more about MPC-Tutor. There are other reasons for needing more than two outs, but you’ll probably know if you need those options, in which case the Live II or the X would probably be a better fit. *Wifi and ethernet are currently used for three purposes. MPC-Tutor (Andy Avgousti) is a beat maker, musician, sound designer and a leading expert on the Akai MPC sampler, who since 2002 has been creating critically acclaimed MPC tutorial books including the groundbreaking 'Beat Making on the MPC' and MPC Bible series. I think it’s unlikely, seems to be a standalone-only feature. Remember the MPC One can export all your songs as WAV files including ‘exploding’ this into individual WAV files for each track which you can then import into your DAW. This is very difficult area to judge as it really comes down to personal taste. The MPC One and MPC Live II are very desktop friendly, they can tuck into small spaces or sit comfortably on a floor stand. Existing MPC users might initially require a couple of weeks to adapt, but I honestly don’t see these smaller pads as a problem. Any word on Ableton Live Control on MPC One? Is this kind of workflow covered in the MPC Bible? This way you can select which channels are sent through those outputs. I’m not really sure if I should sell my 1000 and buy the MPC One lol. I find SD card loading/saving speeds perfectly fine on these MPCs. Now don’t confuse this with ‘Ableton Link’, this specialist form of syncing between the MPC and Ableton Live (via ethernet on the MPC One) is still there. Read more about MPC-Tutor.